The concept of dichotomy of the innovation process in an enterprise
Okładka tom 36
PDF

Keywords

innovation
models of the innovation process
innovative project management
concept of the dichotomy of the innovation process

How to Cite

KoziołL. (2017). The concept of dichotomy of the innovation process in an enterprise. The Malopolska School of Economics in Tarnow Research Papers Collection, 36(4), 43-55. https://doi.org/10.25944/znmwse.2017.04.4355

Abstract

The article presents selected, more important definitions of innovation in an enterprise, paying attention to those of them which emphasize its immaterial character. It describes models of the innovation process, concepts of the innovativeness system and models of the innovative activity of a firm. It was found out that the elements of these objects are a coherent entirety. The principle of the presented research approach is the paradigm assigned to Schumpeter of merging various activities within the innovation process. It turned out, however, that an attempt to implement such a broad programme, namely the invention and the application of innovation, often ends in failure. The reason is that we cannot recognize the tools of analysis and define the determinants of the innovation process in the comprehensive Schumpeterian approach, however, we can resolve these issues by studying each of the processes separately. The aim of the article is to present the concept of the dichotomy of the innovation process in an enterprise and indicate the way of using it in practice. Two autonomous processes, crucial for the development of innovativeness, are distinguished in this concept, namely the process of innovation invention and the process of innovation implementation. In the strategy of an organization it is necessary to define the object and the scope of analysis, at the same time considering the level of innovation ability of an enterprise; in a creative industry they may specialize in creating ideas, designing novelties and offering innovative projects to an appropriately selected target group. Traditional firms should develop and implement these projects in practice to the benefit of customers. It should be emphasized that the choice of the subject of innovative activity determines the innovation ability of the organization, the ability to manage innovative projects and the use of modern (agile) management methods, as well as management pragmatics. The article is of theoretical and analytical character. To achieve the aim and verify the theses, following research methods were used: literature analysis, impact factor analysis, professional conversations with experts.

https://doi.org/10.25944/znmwse.2017.04.4355
PDF

References

Amabile, T. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. New York: Springer Verlag. ISBN 3540908307.
View in Google Scholar

Bartol, K.M., Martin, D.C. (1991). Management. New York: McGraw-Hill. ISBN 0070039267.
View in Google Scholar

Bonney, L.B. (2012). Insights into ‘mysterious processes’: Incentivising co-innovation in agrifood value chains. PhD thesis. University of Tasmania.
View in Google Scholar

Drucker, P.F (1992). Innowacja i przedsiębiorczość. Praktyka i zasady. Transl. by A. Ehrlich. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne. ISBN 8320808707.
View in Google Scholar

Duncan, W.R. (1995). A Guide to the project management body of knowledge. Upper Darby, PA: Project Management Institute. ISBN 1880410133.
View in Google Scholar

Griffin, R. (2004). Podstawy zarządzania organizacjami. Transl. by M. Rusiński. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN. ISBN 8301140186.
View in Google Scholar

Gruber, M., Kim, S.M., Brinckmann, J. (2015). What is an attractive business opportunity? An empirical study of opportunity evaluation decisions by technologists, managers, and entrepreneurs. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 9(3), 205–225.
View in Google Scholar

Haefele, J. W. (1962). Creativity and innovation. New York: Reinhold Publishing Corporation.
View in Google Scholar

Hogan, S.J., Soutar, G.N., McColl-Kennedy, J.R., Sweeney, J.C. (2011). Reconceptualizing professional service firm innovation capability. Scale Development. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(8), 1264–1273.
View in Google Scholar

Holmes, M., Holcomb, T.R., Klein, P.G., Ireland, R.D. (2013). The role of judgment and decisions in new-venture formation: Toward a behavioral model. Paper presented at the Strategic Management Society Conference, Atlanta.
View in Google Scholar

Howells, J. (2005). The management of technological innovation: The shaping of technology and institutions of the market economy. London: Sage. ISBN 9781446229842.
View in Google Scholar

Kelley, T., Littman, J. (2009). Sztuka innowacji. Transl. by G. Łuczkiewicz. Warszawa: MT Biznes. ISBN 9788361040859.
View in Google Scholar

Kozioł, L., Ćwiertniak, R. (2018). Kształtowanie portfela projektów w zarządzaniu innowacjami. In: P. Cabała (ed.). Zarządzanie portfelem projektów w organizacji. Koncepcje i kierunki badań (pp. 183–203). Kraków: Mfiles.pl. ISBN 9788394140847.
View in Google Scholar

Kozioł, L., Wojtowicz, A., Karaś, A. (2017). The concept of the innovative tourism enterprises evaluation capability. In: V. Katsoni, A. Upadhya, A. Stratigea (eds.). Tourism culture and heritage in a smart economy (pp. 159–172). Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Cham: Springer. ISBN 9783319477312.
View in Google Scholar

Kuznets, S. (1959). Six lectures on economic growth. Glencoe, Il: Free Press of Glencoe.
View in Google Scholar

Lucas, R.E. Jr. (1988). On the mechanism of economics development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22(1), 3–42.
View in Google Scholar

Mankins, J.C. (1995). Technology readiness levels. A White Paper. Washington: NASA. Advance Concepts Office, Office of Space Access and Technology.
View in Google Scholar

McGowan, P. (1997). Innowacja i przedsiębiorczość wewnętrzna. In: D. M. Steward (ed.). Praktyka kierowania (pp. 579–600). Transl. by A. Ehrlich. Warszawa: Polskie Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne. ISBN 8320810256
View in Google Scholar

Podręcznik Oslo. (2008). Zasady gromadzenia i interpretacji danych dotyczących innowacji. Warszawa: European Commission, OECD, Ministry of Science and Higher Education. ISBN 9788361100133.
View in Google Scholar

Porter, M.E. (1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York: Free Press. ISBN 0029253616.
View in Google Scholar

Rogers, E.M. (2003). Diffusion of innovation. New York: Free Press. ISBN 0743222091.
View in Google Scholar

Schumpeter, J. A. (1939). Business cycles. A theoretical, historical and statistical analysis of the capitalist process. New York: McGrow-Hill Book Company.
View in Google Scholar

Skillicorn, N. (2016). What is innovation? 15 experts share their innovation definition. In: Idea to value [online, accessed: 2017-11-15]. Retrieved from: https://www.ideatovalue.com/inno/nickskillicorn/2016/03/innovation-15-experts-share-innovation-definition/.
View in Google Scholar

Tidd, J., Bessant, J. (2013). Zarządzanie innowacjami. Integracja zmian technologicznych, rynkowych i organizacyjnych. Transl. by J. Szostak. Warszawa: Oficyna a Wolters Kluwer business. ISBN 9788326431500.
View in Google Scholar

Tödtling, F., Lehner, P., Kaufman, A. (2009). Do different types of innovation rely on specific kinds of knowledge interactions? Technovation, 29(1), 59–71.
View in Google Scholar

Trías de Bes, F., Kotler, P. (2013). Innowacyjność przepis na sukces. Model „od A do F”. Transl. by M. Zawiślak and J. Środa. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Rebis. ISBN 9788375108132.
View in Google Scholar

Whitfield, P. (1979). Innowacje w przemyśle. Transl. by T. Mroczkowski. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne.
View in Google Scholar

Wysocki, R. (2013). Efektywne zarządzanie projektami: tradycyjne, zwinne, ekstremalne. Gliwice: Helion. ISBN 9788324639069.
View in Google Scholar

© Copyright by Małopolska School of Economics in Tarnów. The articles are available under the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.