Abstract
The purpose of the study is to determine the financial impact of expenditure on research and development activities (R&D) of selected companies listed on the Warsaw Stock Exchange. The work is based on reports of 44 such companies, which conducted R&D activities between 2015 and 2017. Expenditure on R&D was taken as a diagnostic variable in the assessment of a given company’s management efficiency. The financial condition was assesed using three diagnostic indicators: the return of assets, current liquidity levels and debt ratio. The two first were assumed to be stimulants, while the third was taken to be destimulant. A scoring method—recommended among others by M. Tarczyńska—Łuniewska and W. Tarczyński—was used to construct a complex measurement of the overall financial condition. The methodology adopted was based on the results of studies conducted by (among others) Baruch, Hurwitz, Lines and Schmidt, Walczak, as well as Glova, Dancakova and Suleimenova. The results observed made for an examination of a subtle relationship between financial results of the companies with the levels of R&D activities conducted. It was found that there was no significant impact of research activities on the financial condition and management effectiveness of the selected enterprises.
References
Borowiecki, R., Siuta-Tokarska, B. (2017). Problemy innowacyjności gospodarki Polski, ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem działalności badawczo-rozwojowej. Nierówności Społeczne a Wzrost Gospodarczy, 50, 163–176. DOI: 10.15584/nsawg.2017.2.10.
View in Google Scholar
Dahlgaard, J. J., Chen, C. K., Jang, J. Y., Banegas, L. A., Dahlgaard-Park, S. M. (2013). Business excellence models: Limitations, reflections and further development. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 24(5–6), 519–538. DOI: 10.1080/14783363.2012.756745.
View in Google Scholar
Dahlgaard, J. J., Dahlgaard, S. M. P. (1999). Integrating business excellence and innovation management: Developing a culture for innovation, creativity and learning. Total Quality Management, 10(4–5), 465–472. DOI: 10.1080/0954412997415.
View in Google Scholar
Drucker, P. F. (2006). Innovation and entrepreneurship. New York: Harper Business. ISBN 9780060851132.
View in Google Scholar
EFQM. (2019). European Foundation for Quality Management. Official website [online, accessed: 2019-02-22]. Brussels. Retrieved from: http://www.efqm.org/.
View in Google Scholar
Eurostat. (2016). High-tech industry and knowledge-intensive services (htec) [online, accessed: 2019-01-13]. Luxembourg: Eurostat, the statistical office of the European Union. Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/cache/metadata/en/htec_esms.htm.
View in Google Scholar
Glova, J., Dancakova, D., Suleimenova, Sh. (2018). Managerial aspect of intangibles: Own development or external purchased intangible assets—what does really count? Polish Journal of Management Studies, 18(2), 84–93. DOI: 10.17512/pjms.2018.18.2.07.
View in Google Scholar
Glova, J., Mrazkova, S. (2018). Impact of intangibles on firm value: An empirical evidence from European Public Companies. Ekonomický časopis, 66(6), 665–668.
View in Google Scholar
Grabara, J., Dima, I. C. (2012). The strategies and their role in improving the management of a company from the SME sector under global conditions. Internal Auditing & Risk Management, 7(4), 17–26.
View in Google Scholar
Griffin, R. W., Pustay, M. W. (2005). International business: A managerial perspective. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall. ISBN 0131422634.
View in Google Scholar
Grudzewski, W. M., Hejduk, J. (2002). Przedsiębiorstwo przyszłości – wizja strategiczna. Warszawa: Difin. ISBN 8372513031.
View in Google Scholar
Grycuk, A. (2010). Kluczowe wskaźniki efektywności (KPI) jako narzędzie doskonalenia efektywności operacyjnej firm produkcyjnych zorientowanych na lean. Przegląd Organizacji, 2, 28–31.
View in Google Scholar
Haryanto, A. T., Haryono, T. (2015). The influence of market orientation on innovation type and enterprise performance. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 11(1), 68–78.
View in Google Scholar
Hult, G. T., Hurley, R. F., Knight, G. A. (2004). Innovativeness: Its antecedents and impact on business performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 33(5), 429–438. DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2003.08.015.
View in Google Scholar
Hurwitz, J., Lines, S., Montgomery, B. (2002). The linkage between management practices, intangibles performance and stock returns. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 3(1), 51–61. DOI: 10.1108/14691930210412845.
View in Google Scholar
Kaplan, R. S., Norton, D. P. (1992). The Balanced Scorecard—measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, January–February, Reprint 92105, 70–79.
View in Google Scholar
Kim, W. Ch., Mauborgne, R. (2005). Blue ocean strategy: How to create uncontested market space and make the competition irrelevant. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. ISBN 9781591396192.
View in Google Scholar
Krause, J. (2016). Evaluation of the impact of innovative activities on productivity—example from the Czech Republic. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 13(2), 101–109. DOI: 10.17512/pjms.2016.13.2.10.
View in Google Scholar
Lev, B. (2001). Intangibles: Management, measurement and reporting. Washington: Brookings Institution Press. ISBN 0815700938
View in Google Scholar
Lev, B., Sougiannis, T. (1996). The capitalization, amortization, and value-relevance of R&D. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 21(1), 107–138. DOI: 10.1016/0165-4101(95)00410-6.
View in Google Scholar
Lisek S. (2009). Mierniki syntetyczne w procesie diagnozowania sytuacji finansowej przedsiębiorstwa. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego: Finanse, Rynki Finansowe, Ubezpieczenia, 18, 263–270.
View in Google Scholar
Mohammad, M., Mann, R., Grigg, N., Wagner, J. P. (2011). Business excellence models: An overarching framework for managing and aligning multiple organisational improvement initiatives. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 22(11), 1213–1236. DOI: 10.1080/14783363.2011.624774.
View in Google Scholar
NIST. (2020). About Baldrige [online, accessed: 2020-08-20]. Gaithersburg: National Institute of Standards and Technology. Retrieved from: https://www.nist.gov/baldrige/how-baldrige-works/about-baldrige.
View in Google Scholar
Parmenter, D. (2015). Key Performance Indicators: Developing, implementing, and using winning KPIs. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 9781118925102.
View in Google Scholar
Porter, M. E. (1998). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. New York: The Free Press. ISBN 0684841487.
View in Google Scholar
Sierpińska, M., Jachna, T. (1994). Ocena przedsiębiorstwa według standardów światowych. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN. ISBN 8301111879.
View in Google Scholar
Sudoł, S. (1999). Przedsiębiorstwo. Podstawy nauki o przedsiębiorstwie. Teorie i praktyka zarządzania. Toruń: Towarzystwo Naukowe Organizacji i Kierownictwa „Dom Organizatora”. ISBN 8372850798.
View in Google Scholar
Tarczyński, W., Tarczyńska-Łuniewska, M., Tarczyński, P. (2017). Scoringowa metoda wyznaczania sektorowego wskaźnika siły fundamentalnej na przykładzie spółek notowanych na Giełdzie Papierów Wartościowych w Warszawie. Finanse, Rynki Finansowe, Ubezpieczenia, 2, 21–31. DOI: 10.18276/frfu.2017.86-02.
View in Google Scholar
Walczak, W. (2010). Znaczenie niematerialnych zasobów w procesach budowania wartości rynkowej przedsiębiorstwa. E-mentor, 4(36), 43–51. Retrieved from: http://www.e-mentor.edu.pl/artykul/index/numer/36/id/775.
View in Google Scholar
Wawak, T. (2001). Zmiany w otoczeniu a jakość zarządzania i zarządzanie jakością. Przegląd Organizacji, 6, 27–31.
View in Google Scholar
Woźniak, M. (ed.). (2002). Statystyka ogólna. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Akademii Ekonomicznej w Krakowie. ISBN 8372521131.
View in Google Scholar
Zymonik, J. (2012). Samoocena w kontekście Polskiej Nagrody Jakości – kryteria i trendy. Zarządzanie i Finanse, 10(3), part 1, 141–156.
View in Google Scholar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.