Abstract
Lameness has a detrimental effect on herd productivity, and is second only to mastitis in this respect. The objective of this study is to calculate the cost of different types of lameness. This would enable effective decision making of whether it may or may not be economically optimal for a cow to be kept in the herd, inseminated, culled or replaced. The animals included in the survey were reared in different variants of free-range production systems. For the purposes of the study, cows from three farms were divided into two groups—cows with diagnosed lameness, and healthy cows over the 305-day lactation period. According to the results of the survey, the revenues from dairy cows with lameness were reduced by up to 15%, whereas the expenses per animal were higher by up to 17%. Treatment costs of affected cows were increased from 1.5 times at the second farm to 17.3 times at the third farm. The absolute economic results (profit per cow) in lame cows were reduced by 23.8% at the second farm and by 28.9% at the first farm. Cost effectiveness in healthy cows was by 11.6% higher for the second and by 32.6% higher for the first farm. The production costs of 1 litre milk in lame cows were increased by 17.1% (third farm) and by 29.3% (second farm).
References
Enting, H., Kooij, D., Dijkhuizen, A. A., Huire, R. B. M., Noordhuizenstassen E. N. (1997). Economic losses due to clinical lamenees in dairy cattle. Livestock Production Science, 49, 259–267.
View in Google Scholar
Ganchev, G., Mitev, Y. (1997). Hoof Diseases. In: Manual of livestock breeding. Part 3 (pp. 308–315).
View in Google Scholar
Green, L. E., Hedges, V. Y., Schukken, Y. H., Blowey, B. W., Packington A. Y. (2002). The impact of clinical lameness on the milk yield of dairy caws. Yournal of Dairy Science, 85, 2250–2256.
View in Google Scholar
Loque, D. N. (1997). Productivity management and disease in dairy cattle. Bovine Practitioner, 31(2), 51–55.
View in Google Scholar
O’Callaghan, K. (2002). Lameness and associated pain in cattle: Challenging traditional perceptions. In Practice, 24 (4), 212–219.
View in Google Scholar
Olsen, J. D. (1997). The relationship between nutrition and management to lameness in dairy cattle. Bovine Practitioner, 31 (2), 65–68.
View in Google Scholar
Penev, T. (2011). Lameness scoring systems for cattle in dairy farms. Agricultural Science and Technology, 3 (4), 291–298.
View in Google Scholar
Penev, Т. (2013). Effect of hygienic and technological factors on lameness with regard to production and reproduction traits of dairy cows. Unpublished doctoral dissertation (pp. 88–111).
View in Google Scholar
Penev, T., Mitev, Y., Iliev, A., Borisov, I., Miteva T., Gergovska, Z., Uzunova K. (2012). Hygienic and technological conditions favouring lameness in dairy cows: A review. Revue de Medicine Veterinaire, 163(11), 499–504.
View in Google Scholar
Rousseau, Y. F. (1987). Prevenir les boiteries: Maitriser la santé des bouvines, 75–81.
View in Google Scholar
Simbirtsev, P. F., Terehov, I. F. (1982). Hoof diseases in cows and bulls of farmers: Important problems of obstetric gynecological and surgical pathology of farm animals. Proceedings of Scientific Works, 59–64.
View in Google Scholar
Warnick, L. D., Yanssen, D., Guard C. L., Grouhn, Y. T. (2001). The effect of lameness on milk production in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 84, 1988–1997.
View in Google Scholar
Weaver, A. D., Jean, G. S., Steiner, A. (2005). Bovine surgery and lameness. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. ISBN 1-4051-2382-6.
View in Google Scholar
© Copyright by Małopolska School of Economics in Tarnów. The articles are available under the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License