Keywords
affective conflict
supervisory board
Top Management Team
How to Cite
Abstract
The introduction of the upper echelons theory by Hambrick and Mason in 1984 raised the interest in Top Management Teams (TMT) as key decision makers and in their impact on organizations’ performance. As initial search for the relation between TMT structure and company effectiveness did not bring conclusive results, recently the emphasis has been put on TMT functioning and group processes. Affective conflicts defined as a disagreement between team members caused by personal dislikes are one of them. The main objective of this article is to enrich theoretical considerations with the empirical identification of the relationship between affective conflicts in supervisory boards and their effectiveness. Moreover, various determinants of affective conflicts were examined. Apart from theoretical analysis of the problem, the value of this article is the presentation of the results of own empirical study conducted among members of supervisory boards representing 46 public companies operating in Poland. The results showed that affective conflicts decrease board performance, but the relation is not statistically significant. It was also observed that the strongest determinats of affective conflicts are work organization, education level of board memebers, and team cohesiveness. Conclusions are useful for the organization and moderation of board meetings and the selection of candidates.
References
Amason, A. C. (1996). Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: Resolving a paradox for Top Management Teams. Academy of Management Journal, 39(1), 123–148. DOI: 10.5465/256633.
View in Google Scholar
Amason, A. C., Liu, J., Fu, P. (2010). TMT demography, conflict and (effective) decision making: The key role of value congruence. Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings, 1–6. DOI: 10.5465/ambpp.2010.54491815.
View in Google Scholar
Amason, A. C., Mooney, A. C. (1999). The effects of past performance on Top Management Teams conflict in strategic decision making. The International Journal of Conflict Management, 10(4), 340–359. DOI: 10.1108/eb022829.
View in Google Scholar
Amason, A. C., Sapienza, H. J. (1997). The effects of top management team size and interaction norms on cognitive and affective conflict. Journal of Management, 23, 495–516. DOI: 10.1177/014920639702300401.
View in Google Scholar
Atkinson, A., Atkinson, M. (2006). Board processes and the quality of board decision making. CMA Management, 80(6), 48–53.
View in Google Scholar
Badke-Schaub, P., Goldschmidt, G., Meijer, M. (2010). How does cognitive conflict in design teams support the development of creative ideas? Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(2), 119–133. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00553.x
View in Google Scholar
Barwacz, K. (2011). Efficiency of the owner’s supervision in public sector enterprises in view of the new institutional economy. Zeszyty Naukowe Małopolskiej Wyższej Szkoły Ekonomicznej w Tarnowie, 17(1), 29–42. DOI: 10.25944/znmwse.2011.01.2942.
View in Google Scholar
Bermig, A., Frick, B. (2010). Board size, board composition and firm performance: Empirical evidence from Germany [online, accessed: 2011-01-15]. Working Papers. Retrieved from: SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1623103.
View in Google Scholar
Bielski, M. (2002). Podstawy teorii organizacji i zarządzania. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo C. H. Beck. ISBN 8372470456.
View in Google Scholar
Bohdanowicz, L. (2010). Wpływ liczebności rad nadzorczych i zarządów spółek publicznych na wyniki spółek. Master of Business Administration, 3(104), 18–30.
View in Google Scholar
Bohdanowicz, L. (2011). Kobiety w organach statutowych polskich spółek publicznych: Podsumowanie badań. Prace i Materiały Wydziału Zarządzania Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego, 2(1), 227–238.
View in Google Scholar
Bohdanowicz, L. (2017). Pracownicy naukowi w radach nadzorczych polskich spółek publicznych. Organizacja i Kierowanie, 2(176), 427–441.
View in Google Scholar
Brockmann, E. (1996). Removing the paradox of conflict from group decisions. Academy of Management Executive, 10(2), 61–62. DOI: 10.5465/ame.1996.9606161555.
View in Google Scholar
Buchholtz, A. K., Amason, A.C., Rutherford, M. A. (2005). The impact of board monitoring and involvement on top management team affective conflict. Journal of Managerial Issues, 17(4), 405–422.
View in Google Scholar
Carmeli, A., Schaubroeck, J. (2006). Top management team behavioral integration, decision quality, and organizational decline. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(5), 441–453. DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.06.001.
View in Google Scholar
Carpenter, M. A., Geletkanycz, M. A., Sanders, W. G. (2004). Upper Echelons research revisited: Antecedents, elements, and consequences of Top Management Team composition. Journal of Management, 30(6), 749–778. DOI: 10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.001.
View in Google Scholar
Cartwright, D., Zander, A. (1968). Origins of group dynamics. In: D. Cartwright, A. Zander (eds.). Group dynamics: Research and theory (pp. 3–21). New York: Harper and Row.
View in Google Scholar
Castro, C. B., De La Concha, M. D., Gravel, J. V., Perinan, M. V. (2009). Does the team leverage the Board’s decisions? Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(6), 744–761. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00772.x.
View in Google Scholar
Cohen, S. G., Bailey, D. E. (1997). What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23(3), 239–290. DOI: 10.1016/S0149-2063(97)90034-9.
View in Google Scholar
De Dreu, C. W., Weingart, L. R. (2003). Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: a meta-analysis. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4), 741–749. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.741.
View in Google Scholar
Eisenhardt, K. M., Kahwajy, J. L., Bourgeois, L. J. (1997). How management teams can have a good fight. Harvard Business Review, 75, 77–86.
View in Google Scholar
Ensley, M. D., Pearce, C. L. (2001). Shared cognition in top management teams: Implications for new venture performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22(2), 145–160. DOI: 10.1002/job.83.
View in Google Scholar
Forbes, D. P., Milliken, F. J. (1999). Cognition and corporate governance: Understanding boards of directors as strategic decision-making groups. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 489–505. DOI: 10.2307/259138.
View in Google Scholar
Forsyth, D. R. (1990). Group dynamics. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole. ISBN 0534981771.
View in Google Scholar
Hambrick, D., Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper Echelons: The organization as a reflection of its Top Managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206. DOI: 10.5465/amr.1984.4277628.
View in Google Scholar
Hsu, H. (2010). The relationship between Board characteristics and financial performance: An empirical study of United States Initial Public Offerings. International Journal of Management, 27(2).
View in Google Scholar
Koładkiewicz, I. (2013). Skuteczna rada nadzorcza. Perspektywa prezesów spółek – pilotaż ekspercki. Zarządzanie i Finanse, 11(2, part 6), 211–229.
View in Google Scholar
Koładkiewicz, I. (2014). Czynniki warunkujące skuteczność rad nadzorczych. Problemy Zarządzania, 12(2), 68–87. DOI: 10.7172/1644-9584.46.4.
View in Google Scholar
Levi, D. (2001). Group dynamics for teams. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. ISBN 9780761922544.
View in Google Scholar
Levrau, A., Van den Berghe, L. A. (2007). Corporate governance and board effectiveness: beyond formalism. ICFAI Journal of Corporate Governance, 6(4), 58–85.
View in Google Scholar
Lis, K. A., Sterniczuk, H. (2005). Nadzór korporacyjny. Kraków: Oficyna Ekonomiczna. ISBN 8389355833.
View in Google Scholar
Marschak, J., Radner, R. (1958). Economic theory of teams. Chapter 1. In: Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers, 59a. New Haven: Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics at Yale University.
View in Google Scholar
Medina, F. J., Munduate, L., Dorado, M. A., Martínez, I., Guerra, J. M. (2005). Types of intragroup conflict and affective reactions. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 20(3/4), 219–230. DOI: 10.1108/02683940510589019.
View in Google Scholar
Mooney, A. C., Holahan, P. J., Amason, A. C. (2007). Don’t take it personally: Exploring cognitive conflict as a mediator of affective conflict. Journal of Management Studies, 44(5), 733–758. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00674.x.
View in Google Scholar
Mooney, A. C., Sonnenfeld, J. (2001). Exploring antecedents to top management team conflict: The importance of behavioral integration. Academy of Management: Proceedings, 1, 11–16. DOI 10.5465/apbpp.2001.6123195.
View in Google Scholar
Murphy, S. A., McIntyre, M. L. (2007). Board of directors performance: A group dynamics perspective. Corporate Governance, 7(2), 209–224. DOI: 10.1108/14720700710739831.
View in Google Scholar
Papenhausen, C., Parayitam, S. (2015). Conflict management strategies as moderators in the antecedents to affective conflict and its influence on team effectiveness. Journal of Business and Management, 21(1), 101–119.
View in Google Scholar
Peszko, A. (2006). Rada nadzorcza w procesie zarządzania przedsiębiorstwem. Warszawa: Difin. ISBN 8372516413.
View in Google Scholar
Pugliese, A., Nicholson, G., Bezemer, P.-J. (2015). An observational analysis of the impact of board dynamics and directors’ participation on perceived board effectiveness. British Journal of Management, 26(1), 1–25. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8551.12074.
View in Google Scholar
Simons, T. L., Peterson, R. S. (1998). Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams: The pivotal role of intragroup trust. Academy of Management: Proceedings, 1, A1–A8. DOI: 10.5465/apbpp.1998.27667017.
View in Google Scholar
Simons, T., Pelled, L., Smith, K. A. (1999). Making use of difference: Diversity, debate, and decision comprehensiveness in top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 42(6), 662–673. DOI: 10.2307/256987.
View in Google Scholar
Smith, K. G., Smith, K. A., Sims Jr., H. P., O’Bannon, D. P., Scully, J. A., Olian, J. D. (1994). Top management team demography and process: The role of social integration and communication. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(3), 412–438. DOI: 10.2307/2393297.
View in Google Scholar
Van der Walt, N., Ingley, C. (2001). Evaluating board effectiveness: The changing context of strategic governance. Journal of Change Management, 1(4), 313–331. DOI: 10.1080/738552741.
View in Google Scholar
Vandewaerde, M., Voordeckers, W., Lambrechts, F., Bammens, Y. (2011). Board team leadership revised: A conceptual model of shared leadership in the boardroom. Journal of Business Ethics, 104, 403–420. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-011-0918-6.
View in Google Scholar
Walker, A., Machold, S., Ahmed, P. K. (2015). Diversity and conflict in board of directors. International Studies of Management and Organization, 45(1), 25–42.
View in Google Scholar
Wan, D., Ong, C. H. (2005). Board structure, process and performance: Evidence from public-listed companies in Singapore. Corporate Governance, 13(2), 277–290. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8683.2005.00422.x.
View in Google Scholar
Wiersema, M. F., Bantel, K. A. (1992). Top management team demography and corporate strategic change. Academy of Management Journal, 35(1), 91–121.
View in Google Scholar
Yun, Y. (2011). Effects of cognitive and affective conflict between hotel’s top managers on firm performance in China. Journal of China Tourism Research, 7(1), 42–61. DOI: 10.1080/19388160.2011.551046.
View in Google Scholar
Ziębicki, B. (2014). Efektywność organizacyjna podmiotów sektora publicznego. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego. ISBN 9788372526762.
View in Google Scholar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.